Cargo
AI Website Builder
Gamma
AI Website BuilderCargo vs Gamma (2026): Which Is Better?
Cargo and Gamma are both popular choices, but they serve different needs. Cargo is a AI Website Builder with heavy AI involvement in the build process, while Gamma is a AI Website Builder that leans heavily on AI-generated output.
Below you'll find a side-by-side breakdown of detection signals, AI scores, and technical fingerprints — plus our honest take on which builder wins for different use cases.
How we detect Cargo vs Gamma — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Website Builder | AI Website Builder |
| AI Score | 90/100 — AI-Native | 90/100 — AI-Native |
| Detection Signals | 6 patterns | 13 patterns |
| Script Detection | 2 patterns | 3 patterns |
| CDN Detection | 1 domains | 3 domains |
| Header Detection | 1 headers | 2 headers |
| Sites Detected | 172 scans | 230 scans |
| Best For | AI-generated websites & quick launchesTry Cargo → | AI-generated websites & quick launchesTry Gamma → |
| Official Website | Visit | Visit |
Example Websites
Cargo
AI Website Builder
Cargo is a ai website builder with an AI Score of 90/100 (AI-Native). Our detection engine uses 6 signal patterns to identify Cargo-built sites.
Gamma
AI Website Builder
Gamma is a ai website builder with an AI Score of 90/100 (AI-Native). Our detection engine uses 13 signal patterns to identify Gamma-built sites.
Platform Overviews
Cargo
Cargo is a design-forward website builder aimed primarily at creative professionals — artists, photographers, designers, and studios — who prioritize visual presentation over conventional page structures. Built and maintained at cargo.site, it generates portfolio and project-based websites with a distinctive structural footprint that sets it apart from mainstream builders. AIWebsiteDetector.com identifies Cargo-powered sites through a combination of six detection signals: two JavaScript script patterns embedded in page markup, one CDN domain tied to Cargo's asset delivery infrastructure, one characteristic HTML pattern present in the document structure, one HTTP response header, and one meta tag pattern injected at the framework level. These overlapping signals allow the detection engine to identify Cargo sites with high confidence even when customization obscures surface-level branding. Cargo operates on a subscription-based pricing model and hosts sites on its own infrastructure, meaning the CDN domain and server-side HTTP headers remain consistent across deployments — a reliability factor that makes Cargo one of the more technically consistent builders to fingerprint at scale.
Gamma
Gamma is an AI-powered presentation and website builder aimed at professionals, educators, and teams who need to create polished decks, documents, and landing pages without traditional design overhead. Sites built with Gamma are hosted on Gamma's own infrastructure under the gamma.app domain, making the hosting environment itself a reliable primary signal for detection. AIWebsiteDetector.com's detection engine identifies Gamma-built sites using a combination of 3 script patterns, 3 CDN domains, 3 HTML patterns, 2 HTTP headers, and 2 meta tag patterns — giving the engine multiple redundant signals to confirm attribution with high confidence even when pages are customized or embedded. The HTML patterns typically surface in structural attributes and class conventions injected by Gamma's rendering pipeline, while the script patterns reflect the platform's bundled JavaScript assets loaded consistently across published sites. The reliance on Gamma's own CDN infrastructure and proprietary HTTP response headers makes this one of the more straightforward builder fingerprints in the detection database, with little ambiguity between Gamma and other AI site builders. Gamma operates on a freemium model with paid plans for advanced features, and because virtually all published Gamma sites resolve through gamma.app subdomains or custom domains with consistent header signatures, detection accuracy remains exceptionally high across site types.
Key Differences
- Both Cargo and Gamma are classified as AI Website Builder tools, making them the most direct competitors in this comparison.
- Cargo scores higher on AI involvement (90/100 vs 90/100 for Gamma), meaning it relies more heavily on AI for site generation and content creation.
- Our detection engine identifies Cargo using 6 fingerprint patterns and Gamma using 13 patterns — more signals generally means more reliable detection.
- Cargo serves assets from
/cargo\.site/iwhile Gamma uses/assets\.gamma\.app/i— making CDN domain analysis one of the most reliable ways to distinguish them.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Cargo if…
- You prefer a ai website builder solution
- You want heavy AI involvement in the design process
- Cargo's detection fingerprint of 6 signals means your site is reliably identifiable
Choose Gamma if…
- You need a ai website builder approach
- AI-assisted generation is a priority for your workflow
- Gamma's ecosystem and community better match your team's existing workflow
Our Pick — Based on 402+ detections
Gamma
The most frequently detected ai website builder in our scan database.
Was this helpful?
Check Which Builder Powers a Site
Curious if a website uses Cargo or Gamma? Scan it now — free.
Cargo vs Framer
Cargo vs Durable
Cargo vs 10Web
Cargo vs Wix AI
Cargo vs Hostinger AI
Cargo vs Typedream