ButterCMS
CMS
Joomla
CMSButterCMS vs Joomla
ButterCMS and Joomla are both popular choices, but they serve different needs. ButterCMS is a CMS with a traditional, manual approach to building, while Joomla is a CMS that prioritises developer or designer control.
Below you'll find a side-by-side breakdown of detection signals, AI scores, and technical fingerprints — plus our honest take on which builder wins for different use cases.
How we detect ButterCMS vs Joomla — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CMS | CMS |
| AI Score | 20/100 — Traditional | 20/100 — Traditional |
| Detection Signals | 2 patterns | 7 patterns |
| Script Detection | 1 patterns | 2 patterns |
| CDN Detection | — | — |
| Header Detection | — | 1 headers |
| Sites Detected | No data yet | 146 scans |
| Best For | Blogs & content-heavy sites | Blogs & content-heavy sitesTry Joomla → |
| Official Website | — | Visit |
Example Websites
ButterCMS websites
ButterCMS
CMS
ButterCMS is a cms with an AI Score of 20/100 (Traditional). Our detection engine uses 2 signal patterns to identify ButterCMS-built sites.
Joomla
CMS
Joomla is a cms with an AI Score of 20/100 (Traditional). Our detection engine uses 7 signal patterns to identify Joomla-built sites.
Platform Overviews
ButterCMS
ButterCMS is a headless CMS with a pre-configured blog.
Joomla
Joomla is a veteran open-source CMS that holds the second-largest market share among self-hosted CMS platforms after WordPress — powering millions of sites for small businesses, government agencies, and non-profits worldwide. Its flexible user access management (ACL) and multilingual support built into the core (no plugin required) make it popular for organizations with complex permission structures and international audiences. Joomla's extension directory has 8,000+ extensions for adding functionality. Joomla sites are identifiable through /media/jui/ paths for jQuery UI assets, com_content references in URL query strings (index.php?option=com_content), the Joomla generator meta tag containing the version number, and /administrator/ path for the backend. The Joomla JavaScript namespace and component-specific CSS classes (mod-articles-category, com_content) appear throughout the markup. Joomla is free and open-source.
Key Differences
- Both ButterCMS and Joomla are classified as CMS tools, making them the most direct competitors in this comparison.
- ButterCMS scores higher on AI involvement (20/100 vs 20/100 for Joomla), meaning it relies more heavily on AI for site generation and content creation.
- Our detection engine identifies ButterCMS using 2 fingerprint patterns and Joomla using 7 patterns — more signals generally means more reliable detection.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose ButterCMS if…
- You prefer a cms solution
- You want more manual control over the final output
- ButterCMS's detection fingerprint of 2 signals means your site is reliably identifiable
Choose Joomla if…
- You need a cms approach
- You prefer traditional building tools with predictable output
- Joomla's ecosystem and community better match your team's existing workflow
Our Pick — Based on 146+ detections
Joomla
The most frequently detected cms in our scan database.
Was this helpful?
Check Which Builder Powers a Site
Curious if a website uses ButterCMS or Joomla? Scan it now — free.
ButterCMS vs WordPress
ButterCMS vs Drupal
ButterCMS vs Ghost
ButterCMS vs Notion Sites
ButterCMS vs HubSpot CMS
ButterCMS vs Webflow CMS