AI Website Insights: July 2026
In July 2026, AI Website Detector scanned 961 unique websites and classified each one based on the technology stack, signals, and fingerprints detected in its code. Of those, 395 (41%) showed clear evidence of AI involvement — either through an AI website builder platform or AI-assisted development practices.
Compared to Jun 2026, total scan volume decreased by 4,865 websites. The share of AI-built sites held steady.
Next.js remained the most commonly detected technology this month, appearing on 155 scanned websites — representing 25% of all builder detections.
Websites analyzed
961
-4,865 vs last month
AI-built
56
6% of total
AI-assisted
339
35% of total
Human/CMS
566
59% of total
Month-over-Month Comparison
Total Scans
▼ 4865
AI-Built %
= 0 pp
Human/CMS %
= 0 pp
Stack Breakdown
Key Findings — July 2026
- 1961 unique websites were analyzed in July 2026.
- 2395 (41%) showed AI involvement — via an AI website builder or AI coding assistance.
- 3The most detected technology was Next.js, appearing on 155 sites (25% market share).
- 456 sites were classified as fully AI-native builds.
- 5AI-native builders (Lovable, Framer, Webflow and others) collectively powered 74 sites this month.
- 6AI adoption held steady at 41% compared to last month.
Builder Market Share
Distribution of detected technologies across 45 unique builders and CMS platforms in July 2026. Percentages are share of all sites with a detected builder (not total scans).
AI-Native Builders
74
12% of builder detections · 7 platforms
CMS / Traditional
149
24% of builder detections · 8 platforms
AI-native builder CMS / traditional Framework / other
Platform Analysis
Next.js led all detected technologies in July 2026 with 155 sites — a 25% share of all builder detections. Its continued dominance is driven by an enormous plugin ecosystem, hosting availability, and a massive global install base that compounds monthly.
WordPress ranked second with 91 sites (14%). Both platforms represent traditional development approaches, suggesting AI adoption, while real, is still concentrated in specific segments.
Rounding out the top three, Elementor appeared on 53 sites, reinforcing the diversity of approaches being used to build production websites today.
AI Builder Spotlight
7 AI-native builder platforms appeared in this month's detections, collectively powering 74 websites (12% of all detected builder sites).
Lovable led the AI-native category with 42 sites. Framer followed with 14, and Webflow with 14. These platforms are winning new site creation — particularly from non-technical founders, solopreneurs, and small businesses who need a production website without a developer.
AI-native builders: sites created using AI website builder platforms that generate design, layout, and code from prompts or AI-driven configuration — not traditional hand-coded or CMS-based deployments.
What This Trend Suggests
AI adoption held steady at 41% month-over-month, suggesting a period of consolidation rather than rapid acceleration. The underlying mix between AI-native builds and AI-assisted development continues to evolve.
For developers and businesses choosing a tech stack today: the data shows AI tools are becoming the default, not the exception. Whether through AI website builders for rapid deployment or AI coding assistants for custom builds, the question is no longer if AI is part of your workflow — it's which tool fits your use case.
What This Data Shows
Every website in this report was scanned by real users of AI Website Detector — people actively investigating tech stacks of live production websites. This makes the dataset uniquely biased toward websites that are being researched, which tends to skew toward higher-traffic or professionally built sites.
The 41% AI involvement figure means that a significant and growing share of websites show detectable AI involvement. AI-native builds (6%) are sites deployed via platforms like Framer, Webflow, Lovable, or Durable — tools where AI generates the site structure, design, and often the copy. AI-assisted builds (35%) are sites where AI coding tools were used during development but a traditional stack was deployed.
The remaining 59% of human/CMS sites are primarily WordPress, Shopify, and other traditional CMSes where no strong AI signals were detected. Note that some of these sites may still use AI for content generation — our detection focuses on the build stack, not content.
How we detect July 2026 verdicts — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
Latest AI Websites
395 totalDomains classified as AI-built or AI-assisted in July 2026. Click any domain to view its full tech stack report.
musestorytelling.com
Framer
raphaelnagel.com
Next.js
archieapp.co
Next.js
amazprimeboxs.com
Vue.js
timefree.ph
Gatsby
seenu.io
Next.js
opengambit.fr
Next.js
blackreach.co
Next.js
utilityforgehub.com
Next.js
dorothyauction.hk
Nuxt.js
csuncut.com
Next.js
alpyz.io
Astro
tooltextpro.com
Next.js
adiconcollections.com
Next.js
app.ccdsstudios.in
Unknown stack
aiwebsitedetector.com
Durable
footy4hope.ca
Next.js
playyourway.com.au
Next.js
modularbase.org
Next.js
theluxe360.co.uk
Unknown stack
Latest Human/CMS Websites
566 totalDomains that appear primarily human-engineered or CMS-based in July 2026.
malware.expert
WooCommerce
malouskusina.com
Unknown stack
malibuartclub.com
Shopify
makeuseof.com
WordPress
makerfarm.com
WordPress
maison-lagrange.com
PrestaShop
mainelobster.com
GoDaddy
maicaafrica.com
Ghost
mae.tn
Drupal
luxaustralia.co
Elementor
lusyn.pt
Tailwind CSS
lura.ph
Unknown stack
lunarlilt.com
Squarespace
lumiflix.stream
Unknown stack
lp.pse.adv.br
Elementor
loungelink.xwolfz.dev
Ghost
loom.com
Sanity
logo-madeinnepal.com
WooCommerce
lookatmy.cv
Ghost
londontheatre.co.uk
Contentful
Most Detected Builders — Full Ranking
All builder and CMS technologies detected this month, ranked by number of websites. Each links to its builder detection page.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as an "AI-built" website?
An AI-built website is one deployed via an AI website builder platform — tools like Framer, Webflow, Lovable, Durable, or 10Web. These platforms use AI to generate the site layout, design, copy, and sometimes code. Detection is based on fingerprints in the site's HTML, scripts, DNS records, and HTTP headers.
How is AI-assisted development different from AI-built?
AI-assisted development refers to sites where a traditional tech stack (React, Next.js, Vue, etc.) was deployed, but signals suggest AI coding tools were used during development. These sites weren't created by an AI builder, but AI played a significant role in writing the code. The stack is conventional; the workflow was AI-augmented. Learn more on the AI detection explainer.
How accurate are these classifications?
Classifications are based on a combination of fingerprint matching, confidence scoring, and signal weighting. Accuracy is high for AI-native builder platforms (>95%), where the platform leaves distinctive code signatures. AI-assisted detection is inherently less precise since AI coding tools leave fewer traces. See the methodology page for full details.
Are these the same websites scanned every month?
No. The dataset reflects websites actually scanned by users of AI Website Detector during July 2026. Each month brings a different set of scanned domains. Sites scanned in multiple months may appear in multiple reports. The data is organic — driven by what our users are researching via the tech stack detector.
Can I use this data in a report or article?
Yes. This data is freely available. Attribution to AI Website Detector is appreciated but not required. For bulk data or API access, see our developer docs.
Analyze Another Website
Scan any domain to see if it was built with AI and contribute data to future monthly reports.