AI Website Insights: July 2026
In July 2026, AI Website Detector scanned 966 unique websites and classified each one based on the technology stack, signals, and fingerprints detected in its code. Of those, 395 (41%) showed clear evidence of AI involvement — either through an AI website builder platform or AI-assisted development practices.
Compared to Jun 2026, total scan volume decreased by 4,860 websites. The share of AI-built sites held steady.
Next.js remained the most commonly detected technology this month, appearing on 155 scanned websites — representing 24% of all builder detections.
Websites analyzed
966
-4,860 vs last month
AI-built
56
6% of total
AI-assisted
339
35% of total
Human/CMS
571
59% of total
Month-over-Month Comparison
Total Scans
▼ 4860
AI-Built %
= 0 pp
Human/CMS %
= 0 pp
Stack Breakdown
Key Findings — July 2026
- 1966 unique websites were analyzed in July 2026.
- 2395 (41%) showed AI involvement — via an AI website builder or AI coding assistance.
- 3The most detected technology was Next.js, appearing on 155 sites (24% market share).
- 456 sites were classified as fully AI-native builds.
- 5AI-native builders (Lovable, Webflow, Framer and others) collectively powered 75 sites this month.
- 6AI adoption held steady at 41% compared to last month.
Builder Market Share
Distribution of detected technologies across 45 unique builders and CMS platforms in July 2026. Percentages are share of all sites with a detected builder (not total scans).
AI-Native Builders
75
12% of builder detections · 7 platforms
CMS / Traditional
150
24% of builder detections · 8 platforms
AI-native builder CMS / traditional Framework / other
Platform Analysis
Next.js led all detected technologies in July 2026 with 155 sites — a 24% share of all builder detections. Its continued dominance is driven by an enormous plugin ecosystem, hosting availability, and a massive global install base that compounds monthly.
WordPress ranked second with 91 sites (14%). Both platforms represent traditional development approaches, suggesting AI adoption, while real, is still concentrated in specific segments.
Rounding out the top three, Elementor appeared on 53 sites, reinforcing the diversity of approaches being used to build production websites today.
AI Builder Spotlight
7 AI-native builder platforms appeared in this month's detections, collectively powering 75 websites (12% of all detected builder sites).
Lovable led the AI-native category with 42 sites. Webflow followed with 15, and Framer with 14. These platforms are winning new site creation — particularly from non-technical founders, solopreneurs, and small businesses who need a production website without a developer.
AI-native builders: sites created using AI website builder platforms that generate design, layout, and code from prompts or AI-driven configuration — not traditional hand-coded or CMS-based deployments.
What This Trend Suggests
AI adoption held steady at 41% month-over-month, suggesting a period of consolidation rather than rapid acceleration. The underlying mix between AI-native builds and AI-assisted development continues to evolve.
For developers and businesses choosing a tech stack today: the data shows AI tools are becoming the default, not the exception. Whether through AI website builders for rapid deployment or AI coding assistants for custom builds, the question is no longer if AI is part of your workflow — it's which tool fits your use case.
What This Data Shows
Every website in this report was scanned by real users of AI Website Detector — people actively investigating tech stacks of live production websites. This makes the dataset uniquely biased toward websites that are being researched, which tends to skew toward higher-traffic or professionally built sites.
The 41% AI involvement figure means that a significant and growing share of websites show detectable AI involvement. AI-native builds (6%) are sites deployed via platforms like Framer, Webflow, Lovable, or Durable — tools where AI generates the site structure, design, and often the copy. AI-assisted builds (35%) are sites where AI coding tools were used during development but a traditional stack was deployed.
The remaining 59% of human/CMS sites are primarily WordPress, Shopify, and other traditional CMSes where no strong AI signals were detected. Note that some of these sites may still use AI for content generation — our detection focuses on the build stack, not content.
How we detect July 2026 verdicts — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
Latest AI Websites
395 totalDomains classified as AI-built or AI-assisted in July 2026. Click any domain to view its full tech stack report.
bowlingalleysim.com
Astro
sunnys.cc
Astro
airdroplayer.com
Lovable
svamdigital.com
Next.js
techpeeker.com
Next.js
jdsephora.com
Lovable
passionequip.com
Nuxt
subcreation.app
Next.js
warthunder-events.vercel.app
Unknown stack
kominotem.com
Next.js
swissimport-services.ch
Next.js
krioweb.com
Lovable
trumpsonian.us
Replit AI
namabeauty.shop
Next.js
arcticorvex.online
Next.js
akua.la
Unknown stack
melophotoandvideo.com
Next.js
gnomestack.com
Next.js
f1speedloan.com
Unknown stack
marketplace.investirdanslancien.fr
Next.js
Latest Human/CMS Websites
571 totalDomains that appear primarily human-engineered or CMS-based in July 2026.
medshun.com
Unknown stack
completionproducts.com
Joomla
meltingscrap.com
GoDaddy
fema.gov
Ghost
mattijnonline.nl
Tailwind CSS
canva.com
Unknown stack
ristoranteperlablu.it
Unknown stack
fairwayshotels.com
Elementor
feltp.com
Ghost
thepicuki.com
Unknown stack
packshare.site
Unknown stack
capacity.cx
Unknown stack
sonichealthcare.com
Unknown stack
adlibplanner.com
Ghost
omnidigitalservices.com
Unknown stack
olimpistas.com
Unknown stack
okta.com
Unknown stack
okasphaltpro.com
Elementor
okosdoboz.hu
Magento
oaic.gov.au
Unknown stack
Most Detected Builders — Full Ranking
All builder and CMS technologies detected this month, ranked by number of websites. Each links to its builder detection page.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as an "AI-built" website?
An AI-built website is one deployed via an AI website builder platform — tools like Framer, Webflow, Lovable, Durable, or 10Web. These platforms use AI to generate the site layout, design, copy, and sometimes code. Detection is based on fingerprints in the site's HTML, scripts, DNS records, and HTTP headers.
How is AI-assisted development different from AI-built?
AI-assisted development refers to sites where a traditional tech stack (React, Next.js, Vue, etc.) was deployed, but signals suggest AI coding tools were used during development. These sites weren't created by an AI builder, but AI played a significant role in writing the code. The stack is conventional; the workflow was AI-augmented. Learn more on the AI detection explainer.
How accurate are these classifications?
Classifications are based on a combination of fingerprint matching, confidence scoring, and signal weighting. Accuracy is high for AI-native builder platforms (>95%), where the platform leaves distinctive code signatures. AI-assisted detection is inherently less precise since AI coding tools leave fewer traces. See the methodology page for full details.
Are these the same websites scanned every month?
No. The dataset reflects websites actually scanned by users of AI Website Detector during July 2026. Each month brings a different set of scanned domains. Sites scanned in multiple months may appear in multiple reports. The data is organic — driven by what our users are researching via the tech stack detector.
Can I use this data in a report or article?
Yes. This data is freely available. Attribution to AI Website Detector is appreciated but not required. For bulk data or API access, see our developer docs.
Analyze Another Website
Scan any domain to see if it was built with AI and contribute data to future monthly reports.