Tilda
AI Website Builder
Gamma
AI Website BuilderTilda vs Gamma (2026): Which Is Better?
Tilda and Gamma are both popular choices, but they serve different needs. Tilda is a AI Website Builder with heavy AI involvement in the build process, while Gamma is a AI Website Builder that leans heavily on AI-generated output.
Below you'll find a side-by-side breakdown of detection signals, AI scores, and technical fingerprints — plus our honest take on which builder wins for different use cases.
How we detect Tilda vs Gamma — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Website Builder | AI Website Builder |
| AI Score | 90/100 — AI-Native | 90/100 — AI-Native |
| Detection Signals | 12 patterns | 13 patterns |
| Script Detection | 3 patterns | 3 patterns |
| CDN Detection | 2 domains | 3 domains |
| Header Detection | 1 headers | 2 headers |
| Sites Detected | 342 scans | 230 scans |
| Best For | AI-generated websites & quick launchesTry Tilda → | AI-generated websites & quick launchesTry Gamma → |
| Official Website | Visit | Visit |
Example Websites
Tilda
AI Website Builder
Tilda is a ai website builder with an AI Score of 90/100 (AI-Native). Our detection engine uses 12 signal patterns to identify Tilda-built sites.
Gamma
AI Website Builder
Gamma is a ai website builder with an AI Score of 90/100 (AI-Native). Our detection engine uses 13 signal patterns to identify Gamma-built sites.
Platform Overviews
Tilda
Tilda is a block-based website builder popular among designers, marketers, and small business owners for creating landing pages, portfolios, and editorial-style websites without writing code. Sites built on Tilda are identifiable through a combination of 3 distinct script patterns, 5 HTML patterns embedded in the page markup, and 2 CDN domains used to serve static assets — all of which leave consistent, reliable fingerprints across published projects. The detection engine also checks for 1 specific HTTP header and 1 meta tag pattern that Tilda injects into rendered pages, making false positives rare even on heavily customized builds. Together, these 12 signal types allow AIWebsiteDetector.com to identify Tilda-powered sites with strong confidence across a wide range of industries and design styles. Tilda operates on a freemium model, offering a free tier with limited pages alongside paid plans, and sites can be published either on Tilda's own subdomain infrastructure or connected to a custom domain — though both configurations retain the same underlying technical signatures that make detection straightforward.
Gamma
Gamma is an AI-powered presentation and website builder aimed at professionals, educators, and teams who need to create polished decks, documents, and landing pages without traditional design overhead. Sites built with Gamma are hosted on Gamma's own infrastructure under the gamma.app domain, making the hosting environment itself a reliable primary signal for detection. AIWebsiteDetector.com's detection engine identifies Gamma-built sites using a combination of 3 script patterns, 3 CDN domains, 3 HTML patterns, 2 HTTP headers, and 2 meta tag patterns — giving the engine multiple redundant signals to confirm attribution with high confidence even when pages are customized or embedded. The HTML patterns typically surface in structural attributes and class conventions injected by Gamma's rendering pipeline, while the script patterns reflect the platform's bundled JavaScript assets loaded consistently across published sites. The reliance on Gamma's own CDN infrastructure and proprietary HTTP response headers makes this one of the more straightforward builder fingerprints in the detection database, with little ambiguity between Gamma and other AI site builders. Gamma operates on a freemium model with paid plans for advanced features, and because virtually all published Gamma sites resolve through gamma.app subdomains or custom domains with consistent header signatures, detection accuracy remains exceptionally high across site types.
Key Differences
- Both Tilda and Gamma are classified as AI Website Builder tools, making them the most direct competitors in this comparison.
- Tilda scores higher on AI involvement (90/100 vs 90/100 for Gamma), meaning it relies more heavily on AI for site generation and content creation.
- Our detection engine identifies Tilda using 12 fingerprint patterns and Gamma using 13 patterns — more signals generally means more reliable detection.
- Tilda serves assets from
/tildacdn\.com/iwhile Gamma uses/assets\.gamma\.app/i— making CDN domain analysis one of the most reliable ways to distinguish them.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Tilda if…
- You prefer a ai website builder solution
- You want heavy AI involvement in the design process
- Tilda's detection fingerprint of 12 signals means your site is reliably identifiable
Choose Gamma if…
- You need a ai website builder approach
- AI-assisted generation is a priority for your workflow
- Gamma's ecosystem and community better match your team's existing workflow
Our Pick — Based on 572+ detections
Tilda
The most frequently detected ai website builder in our scan database.
Was this helpful?
Check Which Builder Powers a Site
Curious if a website uses Tilda or Gamma? Scan it now — free.
Tilda vs Framer
Tilda vs Durable
Tilda vs 10Web
Tilda vs Wix AI
Tilda vs Hostinger AI
Tilda vs Typedream