Joomla
CMS
Contentful
CMSJoomla vs Contentful
Side-by-side comparison of detection signals, AI scores, and features. Use our free tool to check which one powers any website.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CMS | CMS |
| AI Score | 20/100 — Traditional | 20/100 — Traditional |
| Detection Signals | 7 patterns | 7 patterns |
| Script Detection | 2 patterns | 2 patterns |
| CDN Detection | — | 2 domains |
| Header Detection | 1 headers | — |
| Sites Detected | 46 scans | 333 scans |
| Best For | Blogs & content-heavy sitesTry Joomla → | Blogs & content-heavy sitesTry Contentful → |
| Official Website | Visit | Visit |
Example Websites
Joomla websites
Contentful websites
Joomla
CMS
Joomla is a cms with an AI Score of 20/100 (Traditional). Our detection engine uses 7 signal patterns to identify Joomla-built sites.
Contentful
CMS
Contentful is a cms with an AI Score of 20/100 (Traditional). Our detection engine uses 7 signal patterns to identify Contentful-built sites.
Platform Overviews
Joomla
Joomla is a veteran open-source CMS that holds the second-largest market share among self-hosted CMS platforms after WordPress — powering millions of sites for small businesses, government agencies, and non-profits worldwide. Its flexible user access management (ACL) and multilingual support built into the core (no plugin required) make it popular for organizations with complex permission structures and international audiences. Joomla's extension directory has 8,000+ extensions for adding functionality. Joomla sites are identifiable through /media/jui/ paths for jQuery UI assets, com_content references in URL query strings (index.php?option=com_content), the Joomla generator meta tag containing the version number, and /administrator/ path for the backend. The Joomla JavaScript namespace and component-specific CSS classes (mod-articles-category, com_content) appear throughout the markup. Joomla is free and open-source.
Contentful
Contentful is the world's leading headless Content Management System, used by enterprise teams at Nike, Spotify, and Burger King to manage content across websites, apps, and digital experiences from a single platform. Unlike traditional CMS platforms, Contentful separates content storage from presentation entirely — it provides a REST API and GraphQL API that any frontend framework can query, then renders content through whatever technology the team chooses. This architecture means Contentful often powers Next.js, Gatsby, or Nuxt frontends rather than having its own rendering layer. Sites backed by Contentful are identifiable through their media CDN domains: images.ctfassets.net and downloads.ctfassets.net serve all stored assets, and these URLs appear in image src attributes and link hrefs throughout the page. Contentful plans start at a free Community tier, with Team plans from $300/month for professional workflows.
Key Differences
- Both Joomla and Contentful are classified as CMS tools, making them the most direct competitors in this comparison.
- Joomla scores higher on AI involvement (20/100 vs 20/100 for Contentful), meaning it relies more heavily on AI for site generation and content creation.
- Our detection engine identifies Joomla using 7 fingerprint patterns and Contentful using 7 patterns — more signals generally means more reliable detection.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Joomla if…
- You prefer a cms solution
- You want more manual control over the final output
- Joomla's detection fingerprint of 7 signals means your site is reliably identifiable
Choose Contentful if…
- You need a cms approach
- You prefer traditional building tools with predictable output
- Contentful's ecosystem and community better match your team's existing workflow
Our Pick — Based on 379+ detections
Contentful
Detected 7× more often than Joomla across our database of scanned sites.
Was this helpful?
Check Which Builder Powers a Site
Curious if a website uses Joomla or Contentful? Scan it now — free.
Joomla vs WordPress
Joomla vs Drupal
Joomla vs Ghost
Joomla vs Notion Sites
Joomla vs HubSpot CMS
Joomla vs Webflow CMS