
ImageKit
Storage
Uploadthing
StorageImageKit and Uploadthing are both popular choices, but they serve different needs. ImageKit is a Storage with a traditional, manual approach to building, while Uploadthing is a Storage that prioritises developer or designer control.
Below you'll find a side-by-side breakdown of detection signals, AI scores, and technical fingerprints — plus our honest take on which builder wins for different use cases.
How we detect ImageKit vs Uploadthing — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
| Category | Storage | Storage |
| AI Score | 10/100 — Unknown | 10/100 — Unknown |
| Detection Signals | 2 patterns | 4 patterns |
| Script Detection | — | 1 patterns |
| CDN Detection | 1 domains | 1 domains |
| Header Detection | — | — |
| Sites Detected | No data yet | No data yet |
| Best For | Professional websitesTry ImageKit → | Professional websitesTry Uploadthing → |
| Official Website | Visit | Visit |
Storage
ImageKit is a storage with an AI Score of 10/100 (Unknown). Our detection engine uses 2 signal patterns to identify ImageKit-built sites.
Storage
Uploadthing is a storage with an AI Score of 10/100 (Unknown). Our detection engine uses 4 signal patterns to identify Uploadthing-built sites.
/ik\.imagekit\.io/i while Uploadthing uses /utfs\.io/i — making CDN domain analysis one of the most reliable ways to distinguish them.Choose ImageKit if…
Choose Uploadthing if…
Our Pick — Based on our detections
The most frequently detected storage in our scan database.
Was this helpful?
Curious if a website uses ImageKit or Uploadthing? Scan it now — free.