
HSTS
Security
Supabase
DatabaseHSTS and Supabase are both popular choices, but they serve different needs. HSTS is a Security with a traditional, manual approach to building, while Supabase is a Database that prioritises developer or designer control.
Below you'll find a side-by-side breakdown of detection signals, AI scores, and technical fingerprints — plus our honest take on which builder wins for different use cases.
How we detect HSTS vs Supabase — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
| Category | Security | Database |
| AI Score | 10/100 — Unknown | 10/100 — Unknown |
| Detection Signals | 1 patterns | 5 patterns |
| Script Detection | — | 2 patterns |
| CDN Detection | — | 1 domains |
| Header Detection | 1 headers | — |
| Sites Detected | 273 scans | 3 scans |
| Best For | Professional websitesTry HSTS → | Professional websitesTry Supabase → |
| Official Website | Visit | Visit |
Security
HSTS is a security with an AI Score of 10/100 (Unknown). Our detection engine uses 1 signal patterns to identify HSTS-built sites.
Database
Supabase is a database with an AI Score of 10/100 (Unknown). Our detection engine uses 5 signal patterns to identify Supabase-built sites.
Choose HSTS if…
Choose Supabase if…
Our Pick — Based on 276+ detections
Detected 91× more often than Supabase across our database of scanned sites.
Was this helpful?
Curious if a website uses HSTS or Supabase? Scan it now — free.