Ghost
CMS
Contentful
CMSGhost vs Contentful
Side-by-side comparison of detection signals, AI scores, and features. Use our free tool to check which one powers any website.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CMS | CMS |
| AI Score | 20/100 — Traditional | 20/100 — Traditional |
| Detection Signals | 7 patterns | 7 patterns |
| Script Detection | 2 patterns | 2 patterns |
| CDN Detection | — | 2 domains |
| Header Detection | 2 headers | — |
| Sites Detected | 974 scans | 344 scans |
| Best For | Blogs & content-heavy sitesTry Ghost → | Blogs & content-heavy sitesTry Contentful → |
| Official Website | Visit | Visit |
Example Websites
Ghost
CMS
Ghost is a cms with an AI Score of 20/100 (Traditional). Our detection engine uses 7 signal patterns to identify Ghost-built sites.
Contentful
CMS
Contentful is a cms with an AI Score of 20/100 (Traditional). Our detection engine uses 7 signal patterns to identify Contentful-built sites.
Platform Overviews
Ghost
Ghost is an open-source headless publishing platform specifically designed for professional content creators, newsletters, and media businesses. It competes with Substack and WordPress for creators who want full ownership and control of their audience without platform dependency. Ghost's membership and subscription features let creators monetize directly without revenue sharing. Ghost sites are identifiable through their distinctive kg-card CSS class patterns used by Ghost's rich content editor (Koenig), assets served from Ghost's CDN, and the x-powered-by: Express header common to Ghost's Node.js architecture. Ghost(Pro) plans start at $9/month, while self-hosted Ghost is free.
Contentful
Contentful is the world's leading headless Content Management System, used by enterprise teams at Nike, Spotify, and Burger King to manage content across websites, apps, and digital experiences from a single platform. Unlike traditional CMS platforms, Contentful separates content storage from presentation entirely — it provides a REST API and GraphQL API that any frontend framework can query, then renders content through whatever technology the team chooses. This architecture means Contentful often powers Next.js, Gatsby, or Nuxt frontends rather than having its own rendering layer. Sites backed by Contentful are identifiable through their media CDN domains: images.ctfassets.net and downloads.ctfassets.net serve all stored assets, and these URLs appear in image src attributes and link hrefs throughout the page. Contentful plans start at a free Community tier, with Team plans from $300/month for professional workflows.
Key Differences
- Both Ghost and Contentful are classified as CMS tools, making them the most direct competitors in this comparison.
- Ghost scores higher on AI involvement (20/100 vs 20/100 for Contentful), meaning it relies more heavily on AI for site generation and content creation.
- Our detection engine identifies Ghost using 7 fingerprint patterns and Contentful using 7 patterns — more signals generally means more reliable detection.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Ghost if…
- You prefer a cms solution
- You want more manual control over the final output
- Ghost's detection fingerprint of 7 signals means your site is reliably identifiable
Choose Contentful if…
- You need a cms approach
- You prefer traditional building tools with predictable output
- Contentful's ecosystem and community better match your team's existing workflow
Our Pick — Based on 1,318+ detections
Ghost
Detected 3× more often than Contentful across our database of scanned sites.
Was this helpful?
Check Which Builder Powers a Site
Curious if a website uses Ghost or Contentful? Scan it now — free.
Ghost vs WordPress
Ghost vs Drupal
Ghost vs Joomla
Ghost vs Notion Sites
Ghost vs HubSpot CMS
Ghost vs Webflow CMS