Figma AI
AI Website Builder
Gamma
AI Website BuilderFigma AI vs Gamma (2026): Which Is Better?
Figma AI and Gamma are both popular choices, but they serve different needs. Figma AI is a AI Website Builder with heavy AI involvement in the build process, while Gamma is a AI Website Builder that leans heavily on AI-generated output.
Below you'll find a side-by-side breakdown of detection signals, AI scores, and technical fingerprints — plus our honest take on which builder wins for different use cases.
How we detect Figma AI vs Gamma — see our methodology: AI Influence Score calculation, evidence tiers, and fingerprint signal types.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Website Builder | AI Website Builder |
| AI Score | 90/100 — AI-Native | 90/100 — AI-Native |
| Detection Signals | 8 patterns | 13 patterns |
| Script Detection | — | 3 patterns |
| CDN Detection | 2 domains | 3 domains |
| Header Detection | 1 headers | 2 headers |
| Sites Detected | 335 scans | 231 scans |
| Best For | Designers & professional sitesTry Figma AI → | Designers & professional sitesTry Gamma → |
| Official Website | Visit | Visit |
Example Websites
Figma AI
AI Website Builder
Figma AI is a ai website builder with an AI Score of 90/100 (AI-Native). Our detection engine uses 8 signal patterns to identify Figma AI-built sites.
Gamma
AI Website Builder
Gamma is a ai website builder with an AI Score of 90/100 (AI-Native). Our detection engine uses 13 signal patterns to identify Gamma-built sites.
Platform Overviews
Figma AI
Figma AI is a website creation tool built into the Figma design platform, enabling designers and product teams to generate and publish live websites directly from their design workflows without switching tools. Sites built with Figma AI carry a consistent set of technical fingerprints that AIWebsiteDetector.com's detection engine reliably identifies, including signals across 2 CDN domains, 4 distinct HTML patterns, 1 HTTP header, and 1 meta tag pattern embedded in the page markup. These signals — such as characteristic script references, proprietary attribute patterns in the DOM, and platform-specific response headers — allow the detector to distinguish Figma AI-published sites from generic static pages or other no-code builders with high confidence. Because Figma AI sites are hosted on Figma's own infrastructure and published through the platform's native export pipeline, the combination of CDN origin and meta tag fingerprints remains unusually stable across different site types, making false positives rare. The official platform is available at figma.com/sites, positioned as a design-to-web publishing layer for teams already operating within the Figma ecosystem, which gives its technical output a distinctive and consistently detectable structure.
Gamma
Gamma is an AI-powered presentation and website builder aimed at professionals, educators, and teams who need to create polished decks, documents, and landing pages without traditional design overhead. Sites built with Gamma are hosted on Gamma's own infrastructure under the gamma.app domain, making the hosting environment itself a reliable primary signal for detection. AIWebsiteDetector.com's detection engine identifies Gamma-built sites using a combination of 3 script patterns, 3 CDN domains, 3 HTML patterns, 2 HTTP headers, and 2 meta tag patterns — giving the engine multiple redundant signals to confirm attribution with high confidence even when pages are customized or embedded. The HTML patterns typically surface in structural attributes and class conventions injected by Gamma's rendering pipeline, while the script patterns reflect the platform's bundled JavaScript assets loaded consistently across published sites. The reliance on Gamma's own CDN infrastructure and proprietary HTTP response headers makes this one of the more straightforward builder fingerprints in the detection database, with little ambiguity between Gamma and other AI site builders. Gamma operates on a freemium model with paid plans for advanced features, and because virtually all published Gamma sites resolve through gamma.app subdomains or custom domains with consistent header signatures, detection accuracy remains exceptionally high across site types.
Key Differences
- Both Figma AI and Gamma are classified as AI Website Builder tools, making them the most direct competitors in this comparison.
- Figma AI scores higher on AI involvement (90/100 vs 90/100 for Gamma), meaning it relies more heavily on AI for site generation and content creation.
- Our detection engine identifies Figma AI using 8 fingerprint patterns and Gamma using 13 patterns — more signals generally means more reliable detection.
- Figma AI serves assets from
/_runtimes\/sites-runtime\./iwhile Gamma uses/assets\.gamma\.app/i— making CDN domain analysis one of the most reliable ways to distinguish them.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Figma AI if…
- You prefer a ai website builder solution
- You want heavy AI involvement in the design process
- Figma AI's detection fingerprint of 8 signals means your site is reliably identifiable
Choose Gamma if…
- You need a ai website builder approach
- AI-assisted generation is a priority for your workflow
- Gamma's ecosystem and community better match your team's existing workflow
Our Pick — Based on 566+ detections
Figma AI
The most frequently detected ai website builder in our scan database.
Was this helpful?
Check Which Builder Powers a Site
Curious if a website uses Figma AI or Gamma? Scan it now — free.
Figma AI vs Framer
Figma AI vs Durable
Figma AI vs 10Web
Figma AI vs Webflow
Figma AI vs Hostinger AI
Figma AI vs Typedream