Framer Review 2026: Is It Worth It? (Honest Pros & Cons)

Collection pages (blog posts, case studies, team members)

Filtering and sorting

CMS-connected components

Where it falls short compared to Webflow:

No multi-reference fields between collections

More limited query/filter logic

No REST API on standard plans

Performance and SEO

Framer's biggest technical advantage — built on Next.js with static generation:

Pages pre-rendered at build time

Automatic image WebP conversion and lazy loading

Excellent Core Web Vitals scores

Auto-generated sitemaps

Custom meta tags per page

Who Should Use Framer?

Ideal for:

Designers coming from Figma

SaaS marketing sites where animation matters

Freelancers building animated portfolios

Teams prioritizing performance

NOT ideal for:

E-commerce (no native store features)

Complex multi-author editorial sites

Non-designers wanting simple templates

Honest Cons

No e-commerce natively

Smaller ecosystem than Webflow

CMS lacks reference fields

Lock-in on hosted content

$20-35/month for mid-tier features

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Framer good for SEO?

Yes. Static generation, clean HTML, automatic sitemaps, and good image optimization make it one of the better no-code builders for SEO.

Can I use Framer for free?

Yes — one site on framer.website subdomain with Framer badge. Custom domain requires Mini plan ($10/month).

Is Framer used by real companies?

Yes — many recognizable SaaS companies use Framer. Use AIWebsiteDetector.com to verify specific sites, or browse our Framer gallery.

Verdict

Framer in 2026 is genuinely excellent for design-forward marketing sites and portfolios. Class-leading animations, developer-grade performance, intuitive for Figma users.

Not the right tool for e-commerce, powerful CMS, or simple template-based experiences.

Rating: 4.5/5 for marketing sites for design-forward teams.

Compare with: Framer vs Webflow.