Are AI website builders replacing traditional builders?

For simple sites: yes, significantly. For professional design work, complex CMS, and e-commerce: no.

Which has better SEO: AI or traditional builders?

Depends on the specific tool. Framer is one of the best. Durable includes local SEO. Content strategy matters more than platform for SEO outcomes.

Often yes without editing. Heavy editing — real photos, specific copy, custom colors — makes AI-generated sites look distinctive.

Use [AIWebsiteDetector.com](/) to scan any URL — identifies AI builders, traditional no-code builders, and custom code.

Local business web presence: Durable's quality is sufficient; speed advantage is huge

Non-technical founders needing a product demo: Lovable generates real applications

Content iteration: AI builders can rewrite copy and generate images faster

Complex design briefs: When brand identity and unique visuals matter

Complex CMS requirements: Multiple content types with relationships

Large e-commerce: Shopify remains essential

Long-term content strategy: Teams publishing regularly with editorial workflows

"AI builder vs traditional builder" is becoming less meaningful as a distinction:

Wix now has strong AI features built in

Framer uses AI to help generate layouts while remaining a traditional editor at its core

Squarespace uses AI for copy and image suggestions

The real decision: choose the right tool for your specific use case, whether it uses AI or not.

| Your Situation | Best Choice |